Sokal Hoax assignment

For up to 10 points, explain and evaluate Paul Bohossian's argument against post-modern epistemic relativism in "What the Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us".  Do so in no more than 2 pages double spaced.

Sketch Boghossian's argument against post-modern epistemic relativism starting from the Rogern Anyon quote "Science is just one of many ways of knowing the world. [The Zuni's world view is] just as valid as the archeological viewpoint of what prehistory is about."  Boghossian distinguishes three ways of understanding the post-modern assertion that science is just one among a multitude of equally legitimate "ways of knowing".  What does he have to say about each.  Do you think Boghossian overlooks any further ways of understanding the claim that science is just one among many "ways of knowing"?  If so, explain.  What is the potential significance of any further way of understanding the post-modern critique of science.